"Fast, easy to work with and dependable at delivering high quality, innovative work."
A two-week sprint to find where people give up before they pay. If I don't find a fix worth making, there's no fee.
Every moment counts and needs balancing across four key pillars to win the sale.
Users feel in control the whole way, never pushed into action.
Common issues: dark patterns, guesswork, no feedback or removal of choice.
Quick to move through, with just enough friction to feel safe.
Common issues: a fiddly process, big asks too early, or a flow so frictionless it feels off.
A polished, consistent flow that earns trust across surfaces.
Common issues: amateur quirks and inconsistencies, confusing layouts and subtle bugs.
One consistent experience, built on patterns users already know.
Common issues: novel icons or UI to learn, or a flow that shifts look and language as it goes.
The flows that carry your business, rebuilt to lower cognitive load with measurable impact.
Also trusted by HM Government, National Highways, AllianceBernstein, GfK, RSPCA, the European Cultural Foundation and more.
"Fast, easy to work with and dependable at delivering high quality, innovative work."
"During our partnership, we regularly received nearly perfect scores from clients."
"Exceptional personal service and flexibility. All the expertise of a big design agency."
I came up as a product and UX designer, building full products and the flows inside them. The same lesson kept repeating: a few flows carry the whole experience, and that's where the biggest gains are hiding.
What I enjoy most is the digging. Going through the data like a detective to find the drop-off the people closest to it have stopped seeing. I've done it behind card payments at enterprise scale and on small booking and lead flows, and the same rules apply at both ends.
The main thing years of user testing has taught me is to assume nothing. People are never as predictable as anyone expects, so I come in without a theory to prove. I start by understanding how the flow got to where it is, because the team I'm helping usually knows more than they're given credit for.
I've always worked for myself, running a company, an agency, or contracting, because I like a range of problems that trace back to the same few principles. I'd rather work directly with the people making the calls than through layers of management, and be judged on a real change in the numbers, not a deck. One designer, no account layer between you and the work.
If your flow is converting well and you want a brand refresh, I'm not your person. If something's leaking and you want a sharp pair of eyes on it for two weeks, that's the work.
Every change starts with evidence and ends with a clear way to know whether it worked, so nothing gets redesigned on a hunch.
I start with the numbers to find where people drop off, then behavioural analytics to understand why.
Then I rework just the moments that leak, lowering cognitive load and building trust across the four pillars.
From there I set out what to measure and how you'll know it worked, ready for your team to build and ship.
Working with me: mostly async over email and video, light on meetings, and easy to fold into how your team already works.
Fixed price, fixed scope, agreed upfront. Everything you need to ship the change, test it and measure whether it worked.
Week one is diagnosis. If the numbers don't point to a 10%+ uplift worth chasing on your flow, we stop there and you pay nothing. I can't promise the eventual uplift will land (no-one honest can). What I can promise is that you only pay once the evidence for one is on the table. No catches, no clawback.
A 20-minute call to talk through the flow, the metric and whether a sprint is the right fit.